Menu

Live StatementLIVE فارسی Consultation

HomeSystem

Mechanical system · architecture, not parameters

What the system is, why it is not free,
and what happens after the workshop

The architecture of a 100% mechanical system, without its parameters. And a promise that every single trade puts to the test.

01

What I offer

I run a 100% mechanical trading system. It has traded a real account for more than four years and every trade is recorded on Myfxbook. “100% mechanical” means entry, stop-loss, take-profit and position size all come from written rules; none of them is left to my judgement in the moment. If you and I both hold the rules and look at the same chart, we arrive at the same trade, or neither of us arrives at a trade. There is no third case.

The system can be taught. It is not for everyone, and it is not free. This page explains what it is, what I do not publish and why, and exactly what happens after the workshop.

02

One idea, several sub-systems

The whole system rests on one view: price has a centre of gravity, and around it lie layers at predefined distances. The centre is a moving average on the one-hour chart of US30. The layers are fixed distances from that centre, and they have not been changed once in four years. The system asks a single question: where is price now relative to the centre and the layers, and where was it before?

Four sub-systems follow from this view, in two families. The reversion family acts when price has been stretched to a far layer and turns back toward the centre: one sub-system waits for a confirming candle close, the other acts at the critical boundary without waiting. The continuation family acts when price crosses a layer and keeps going instead of turning back. One of these carries a rule I have not seen in any other mechanical system: after a trade closes at its stop, the sub-system locks itself and may not issue a new trade until price physically touches the centre again. The system has memory. Loss after loss in the same direction is forbidden by rule.

All four share one property: every trade enters as a pending order placed beyond the candle that confirmed the signal, and its stop and target are fixed at the moment the order is placed. Nothing is moved afterwards.

03

Sub-system one, step by step

For the long case; the short case is the mirror image.

1
Charge. Price must first reach and touch the lower layer. Until that happens nothing has started, however good the chart looks.
2
Confirmation. Price must come back and close a one-hour candle above the centre of gravity. Not a wick, not a touch. A close.
3
Order. The distance from the layer to the high of that confirming candle is measured. Entry sits a fixed ratio above the candle’s high, the stop a fixed ratio below, the target a fixed ratio above. All three numbers exist the moment the order is placed, as a pending order. If price never reaches the entry, there is no trade.
4
Veto one, spatial interference. Forbidden zones are defined around two slower averages. If the order falls inside them, it is cancelled on the spot, however complete the rest of the setup is.
5
Veto two, violation. If price closes back on the other side of the centre before the order is triggered, the order is void. The system waits for step one to happen again.

That is all. None of the five steps contains words like “market structure”, “strong zone” or “if momentum allows”. Each step has either happened or it has not, and two people holding the rules cannot disagree about it. That is why I say this system can be taught, and why others cannot make the same claim.

The same five steps, on video

No numbers, all the detail: charge, confirmation, measurement, veto, execution. And why ten people holding this rule take ten identical trades. The video is in Persian; the pictures need no translation.

Subjective or mechanical — Subjective or mechanicalFull video, 6 minutes
Sub-system one dissected, with no numbers. Ten people, one chart, ten identical trades. Watch on YouTube ↗

04

What I do not publish, and why

The periods of the averages, the distances of the layers, the entry, stop and target ratios, the filter timeframes and the time conditions. I do not write them here and I will not write them anywhere on this site.

The reason is simple and it is not evasion. These numbers are the product of twenty-four years of my working life, and they are the only thing transferred in the workshop. If all of it were here there would be no workshop. I do not give my life’s work away, any more than a physician pins her prescriptions to the waiting-room wall.

But you do not need those numbers to judge me. You need two things, both public: a live statement showing more than four years and more than 350 trades, and the channel described below, where every trade is announced before it happens. I hold the numbers. Everyone sees what the numbers produce.

05

Why a student sees the same trade

A 100% mechanical system has one natural consequence: a student who holds the rules sees on his own chart the same trade I see. Not a similar one, the same one, with the same entry, stop and target, because none of them depends on taste.

So that this stays more than a claim, every graduate joins the Trade-Matching Channel. It is not sold, it is not public, and it is not a signal service. Its job is to lay my trades and the students’ trades on top of each other. Its rules admit no exception:

1
Every trade is posted as a pending order, before it triggers, with entry, stop and target. Telegram stamps the time, not me.
2
A trade ends in exactly one of two ways: target or stop. No early close, no partial close, no moving the stop.
3
No trade carries a “low-risk” or “high-risk” label and there is no “target one, target two”. One entry, one stop, one target.
4
Every trade posted in the channel is the trade recorded on the Myfxbook statement. Nothing in the channel is missing from the statement; nothing on the statement was absent from the channel.
5
Students take exactly these trades. “I profited and my students lost” cannot happen in this structure, because we take the same trade.

This promise is tested every day, not once. The first trade posted after this page went live will be shown here: the channel message with its Telegram timestamp next to the same row on the statement.

06

The 63 percent

Across more than 350 trades, roughly 63 of every 100 reached the target and 37 reached the stop. Risk-to-reward is fixed and close to 1 : 0.9 on every trade. The system is not built on rare big wins; it is built on frequent wins against equal-sized, pre-defined losses.

That figure is not my claim, it is the statement’s output. And the 37 losses were also by rule: in this system a loss means price reached a stop that was written down in advance, not “I made a mistake”. A system that cannot lose by rule is not a system.

07

“Others teach their strategy, you say nothing”

I hear this often, so here is the answer once. Yes, others teach for free or sell cheap packages. Why free? Because teaching is not where their income comes from. It comes from the broker link, the prop firm, the next package and the advanced course that follows the free one. Their free course is a shop window, not the goods, and what is in the window cannot be transferred, as the paper on cloud patterns shows: styles built on visual recognition do not pass from one person to another, however honest the teacher.

I teach something that does transfer, and the proof is that the student sees the same trade and the matching channel shows it every day. Something that transfers intact, with four years of statement behind it, has a price. Something that does not transfer has to be cheap or free so that nobody asks questions.

So when they say “he says nothing”, they are right. I do not say the numbers. But I am also the only one who put the statement on the table.

08

Not free, and not for everyone

1
Free consultation
One conversation. I learn where you stand; you learn what this system is and what it demands. Many people realise here that this path is not for them, which is a good outcome for both of us.
2
Commitment
Before the workshop, each participant commits to keeping the rules confidential and not passing them on. This is not negotiable.
3
Workshop
The workshop is not free. The price is not written here because this website sells nothing; anyone who has reached the consultation knows it.
4
Trade-Matching Channel
For life, at no extra cost. From then on you and I look at one chart and take one trade.

If you are looking for a method that turns you into a “trader” who reads the market, this page was not for you. If you are looking for a system with four years of live record that runs without judgement, start with the free consultation.

Request a free consultation Live track record Myfxbook statement